Dear Xalle,
I rambled:
QUOTE
The same purpose that we and everything else has, to be what we are and do what we do. If you'll forgive me saying so, Xalle, by taking purpose as a test here, you're switching to a religious viewpoint in which the universe is created by intent and exists to fulfill a purpose. I take a rather different religious viewpoint: That it exists because it exists and is making up its own purposes as it goes along.
You replied:
QUOTE
See its with comments like this that I get confused. The bit that I've underlined... About the universe being just because it is. I have NO problems with that. In fact I would say that isnt a religious standpoint at all.
I believe in deities but I do not believe the universe was created by deities because I do not believe it was created by a First Cause. I'm inclined to believe it exists eternally through unending cycles of creation and destruction. I believe deities exist within it, part of the fabric of it, within fate/wyrd/providence/chance or whatever you want to call it. I do not believe the Gods & Goddesses have a purpose for the universe, I believe they are part of the purpose(s) that the universe develops as it goes along. I would say this is very much a religious standpoint, dear Xalle. Perhaps it is merely a religious standpoint that you have no problem with?
QUOTE
If your deities are not gods, but the inherant energies that are tied into the universe, the why use the term god or deity?
Because that is what they are. In a sense they are the inherent energies that are tied into the universe, but they are also something rather more than that.
QUOTE
Do you beleive that they are sentient, conscious of whats around them? (within their realm of understanding) If so and you beleive that they arent really aware of us, why exactly do you worship them then?
Dear Xalle, please do not think me discourteous if I don't answer these questions. I've a great deal of respect for you, it's just that I don't know what the answers are. I don't believe in the Gods and Goddesses because someone persuaded me with an argument, or even because I devised one myself. I believe in them because they have been part of the way I experience the world at a few, rare, 'peak' times in my life, and the memory of that is sufficient for me to keep faith with it for the rest of the time. I worship them simply because that is the response they inspire in me. It feels something like the way beauty inspires aesthetic appreciation, or danger inspires fear, or a beloved inspires desire. It's a response that is there before you start analysing it, and is still there after analysis has given up! I realise it may make little sense in terms of rationality but it does make sense within an approach informed by the old mythologies. Please note I'm saying 'informed by' there - I don't view myths in the way fundamentalists in other faiths view their scriptures. I don't think any of this can really be explained: "A god who can be understood is no god."
I worship the Gods & Goddesses I worship because I find in that relationship something which inspires and sustains me in my life, and which helps me understand - at a level that's more in bone and nerve and flesh than mind - how my life and death fits into the world. I worship because I feel a very deep sense of gratitude to be alive within this world. Through worship, I feel I am doing what I am for. It's enough for me.
QUOTE
QUOTE
I think it's more a case that we 'give' by acting rightly according to the nature of the deity
Im sorry hon you'll have to clarify this point for me. "According to the nature of the deity" what does that mean? Beings that exist, that require certain.. energies to fuel them need people to worship them to give them that fuel? It seems... parasitic both for the worshiper and the god.
No, not exactly. I think that deities and mortals are interrelated but I've no idea whether they are interdependent. Reciprocal parasitism is a contradiction in terms. It's in the nature of a parasite that its host does not benefit and is often harmed. This seems more a form of symbiosis. Or rather, a form of relationship that symbiosis is a suitable analogy for.
QUOTE
Do you see what Im saying? Im not saying that there is nothing out there, there may well be, in the same way there is probably life on other planets... but its JUST a being, I wouldnt elevate it to the status of god or deity, I certainly wouldnt worship or revere it and while it may be aware of me in the same way I am aware that there are micro-organisims we dont have a relationsip.
OK, but when you consider how astonishing, amazing and complex any being is, how is it JUST a being? Isn't any being - even a centipede or a Tory - something rather awesome in itself? I do not believe I'm elevating anything to the status of a deity, but merely responding to how I understand things to be. Perhaps our differing life experiences have led us to attach differing emotional reactions to words like 'worship' and 'revere'.
QUOTE
I think there are two sides to the whole worship thing. You may have noticed I have an abhorrance of people using gods as a way to "fill in the gaps" or "be an emotional crutch". I dont agree with worshiping things. If the xtian god appeared tomorrow and PROVED his existance. I STILL wouldnt worship him because I dont think he has done anything worthy of worship, I dont think ANY god has. Do you? Ergo... probably not a god. That to me is one side.. the one most athiests argue with.
Yes, I had noticed that

. I don't think the Gods stand outside the universe pulling strings. I think they are woven into the fabric of the universe, doing what they do according to their nature as we do according to ours. In a sense, I see worship as a kind of extension of courtesy, albeit with rather unique nuances. All kinds of people, and other beings, help us along in the course of our lives, from the surgeon who saves your life, through the scaffie who empties your bins, to the pigeon that ends up on your plate. Not to mention the ancestors before you who shaped the world you live in and the unborn after you you're hoping not to have messed things up too much for. These things would be there anyway whether we noticed them, or appreciated them, or not, but it just feels right to acknowledge, and give thanks, when we do notice. OK, this is not an exact analogy for religious devotion but as far as my understanding goes, it's not a million miles away either.
'God of the Gaps'? Nope! Never understood that particular Christian approach. It seems just a rearguard action against science, shrinking religion into an ever diminishing space. Personally, the more I learn through science about the astonishing complexity and interdependence of life in this world, the more sacred this living world appears to be, and the more worthy of reverence and worship the Gods and Goddesses consequently appear to be. I don't expect you to share that view but can you see why it makes sense to me?
"An emotional crutch"? Perhaps that's true in a sense. In addition to prayers of gratitude, I find that when something more than usually challenging befalls me and mine then I pray. Not because I expect some divine hand to descend from the clouds and swat my troubles away but simply because I've found i) it means I'll pile into whatever needs doing more effectively than if I don't, and ii) it gives a sense of perspective, reminding me that I'm just a tiny part of a vast and very complicated universe in which all sorts of stuff is happening to all sorts of things and that's just how it goes. Oddly, instead of inspiring fatalism, this seems to make me try harder.
This doesn't feel like calling into the void of an empty and uncaring universe. There is a sense of being/beings/processes of being responding. A sense of presence, of identities, of interaction. A state that words turn back from, hence the gibberish I'm spouting above. And there are many other forms of epiphany, for of course epiphanies are happening all the time and all over the place in this living earth, not something that happened as a one-off in Palestine two millenia back.
If this is an emotional crutch, I'll happily wave it at you. I respect your point of view. I'm not suggesting atheism isn't the right path for you, merely trying to explain why I'm not an atheist.
QUOTE
However mankinds ego is another side. Man for some reason seems to think that its worthy of having been created by a god. People think because we have cognative abilities that means we're better? We are superior to animals.

Utter crap. what makes you think that any being out there rates you any more than you rate bugs?
I don't, and don't know how you might have gained the impression I did. The life in us is the same as the life in all other living beings. We are not 'special' to the universe, merely to each other - and not always then. We are part of this living world. It is not a preparatory ordeal for some other life elsewhere. I believe the Gods and Goddesses were, and are, part of the process of creation and destruction by which everything came to be, bugs and humans included. I'm not clear how the statements you're making above tie into the religion versus atheism debate? I hope you don't think that because I'm religious I hold other living beings in contempt? Even though rather a lot of religious people seem to think that way, that's not religion but mean-spirited stupidity. And if that's not impious then I don't know what is.
BB,
John Macintyre (who rates bugs quite highly actually)