QUOTE(CornishShaman @ Jun 5 2008, 04:00 PM)
Right, so following my passing comment about it being 'more Shamanism than Wiccan',we appear to have established that Wiccans are not Witches, No, thats not even correct is it? Some are, some arent!
so does that mean Alexandrian and Gardnerians are Witches? Or is it purely Traditionals and Hereditaries ( excluding the Alexandrians and Gardnerians who could probably classify themselves as this), then there are the Heathens, who I assume may or may not call themselves Witches!
Oh and the Christian Witches (that just does my nut in!), and the Seax lot......!!!
This all seems very confusing????!!!
Druids dont generally argue about these sorts of things Ive noticed, I dont see Shamanic Practioners arguing about their paths either, maybe this is why I dont classify myself as a Witch, though many people call me that!
So in future I will refrain from using the term Wiccan and replace it with Witches!
Is there an Expert who can define who is or isnt a witch, please?

You really are having a problem with this arent you!
All those things, Christians, wiccans, druids, alexandrianisim, Gardnerian, heathens, seax, shamanisim are all PATHS. Within those paths you can also be a witch. Think of it this way. If you scooped up a handful of people, they would be all sorts of relions... christians, muslim, jewish but some of them would have blue eyes, you might even be more likely to find blue eyes within one of the groups, but it is NOT relevant. Eye colour does not denote faith and faith does not denote eye colour. Same goes for being a vegetarian, you MIGHT find more... I dunno... buddists are vegetarian, but it is not confined to that religion or any other faith for that matter and the fact that someone IS a vegetarian, does not automaticly make them anything other than a vegetarian.
The fact you find it confusing is unfortunate, but it doesnt mean we just chuck terms about and lable people incorrectly because we have problems getting our heads around things.