QUOTE(Hyppydylan @ Aug 27 2008, 05:54 PM)
This piece was discussed here a while back. As was said there, she wasn't a witch just murdered for being accused a witch so there's nothing for 'us' to forgive.
Leaving aside the question of whether 'we' as a group have the right to give or withhold forgiveness for crimes of the past, this doesn't seem quite right to me.
If, as a group, we have that right, then should it not extend to people who died in 'our' name, whether they were truly what they were accused of being or not?
If someone is believed to be, say, a Shriner, and is murdered because of it, does the fact that they were not, in fact, a Shriner change the right of the Shriners to be upset? Just because the target turned out not to be a member of the target group, the group has still been targeted. The group may in fact have a responsibility to be upset on the victim's behalf, or even to take some responsibility for the crime itself, since another got tarred with their brush.
Not that I think we do, as a group, have that right. It reminds me of the current 'spiritual heirs' of the Templars suing whoever it is they're suing for redress of ancient wrongs. They at least can prove some line of descent from the originals, fuzzy as it is.
unsung