QUOTE(Moonhunter @ Oct 18 2008, 03:17 PM)
I agree with your own thoughts about "what's in it for the deity" - or that's my experience. One interesting thing I've observed, is when a person with a really good relationship with a god slides over from talking about what the god is like to saying with confidence what the god might do in a specific human situation which is not purely their own relationship with that god. Yeah, I know that sounds complicated, but what I'm talking about is the transition from "Hey, this is my experience, does it match yours?" to "This is what s/he's like and you need to listen to what I tell you because I know this god/dess inside out." That latter attitude comes (for me) with the klaxons and red warning lights of hubris.
Sometimes the slide from one side to the other is more subtle, but there's something there which still stops me in my tracks and makes me want to get out fast before the inevitable happens. It begins to smack far too much for me of the human claiming the ownership.
gods, I hope I never do that...

I completely agree, it does always amuse me when people go from sharing experience to pretty much acting like the pagan pope!!! (Idiots...don't they know that Steve MacNallan from the AFA has already taken the job of Asapope?!

)
We have no bloody
ex cathedra and yes it is complete hubris.
As people that work with deities, after a while we can sort of guess what that deity would do or what the response would be but what would be a guess based on experience and a hell of a lot different from claiming to actually know.
I think too many folks that work with deities think that they are the ones calling the shots as opposed to the deities. I also do think that some of it comes from the correspondence chart mentality that every newbie book seems to espouse.
Oh well, dommage pour eux...they'll learn!