QUOTE(woozle @ Mar 3 2009, 06:04 PM)
Marto, do you always have to turn everything into a personal crusade - your view vs. the rest of the world?
The question here is not whether it is true or not. I was asking about a difference in two techniques and to do that it is necessary to take as read that the two techniques actually exist. Lots, if not most of the things in the pagan world can be pulled to bits with great ease but it all boils down to whether you believe or not. I am actually finding LL's and others posts interesting and helpfull, yours not.
So, you are totally right Marto, and everyone else is wrong. Now do you mind if we continue to discuss the OP?
No, I don't
always turn everything into a 'personal crusade'. First, I don't KNOW you or LL or many other people here so how can it be 'personal'? It's just my brain responding to what it reads on-line. Also, if I 'crusade' at all it's for things I think matter more: the pain in this world I may be able to help alleviate in some small way.
I come to the forum to relax and think and learn things. And if you think the questions I ask only pertain to myself in the world only, I would suggest you are very wrong.
This: ++The question here is not whether it is true or not. I was asking about a difference in two techniques and to do that it is necessary to take as read that the two techniques actually exist. ++
Makes no sense to myself at...all. Or it does in the way people might discuss the various attributes of say, different kinds of Aliens that may have been captured. Or people exchanging views on what characters in movies or books 'did next' or think or so on and so on.
But I thought this post was put on the concept known as 'Astral travel' , not as an exchange of make-believe views, but as an exploration of actual events.
And here comes this person who says they can transcend the ideas of physics as we know them. Don't you think I or anyone else would be curious? Great discoveries are made by those that don't necessarily accept 'received' wisdom but who push the boundaries of knowledge.
If ( and everyone knows this story) someone noticed in Victorian times that more children and mothers died in childbirth when surgeons came straight to the birthing room from the dissecting rooms but someone who washed their hands and changed their clothes in between had less deaths, should the investigation of this important event run thus?:
"He washes up and changes and less of his patients get sepsis and die"
" Well, they do say cleanliness is next to godliness so I guess God favours him, yes?"
" Oh, O.K. . That must be the answer. What we should do know is try and get better with God and those NOT in his favour will lose more patients".
I am always interested in new ideas nor do I reject an idea for it's novelty or because it hasn't yet been explored fully. And THAT ...is what I try to do: explore an idea more fully. Nowt wrong with that and there is no 'judgment' inherent in such a position. It's merely a further investigation. I thought that was a good thing?
If someone tells me they can fly, I don't say " No you can't", I say "Cool, show me". If they then can't fly and attribute this failure to my lack of belief in their ability, then doubt starts to creep in.
My 'big' doubt started to creep in here when LL said it was 'unethical' to travel to the future to discover a winning lottery number. Unethical? The last lottery draw here was for 43 Million. Can you IMAGINE how many people that could feed, clothe, educate and give medical care to? How many friends struggling with debt. , mortgages and child raising that could help? And it's UNETHICAL? .
Please.
I happen to find the notion of O.B.E.s and such very interesting. Further, if I just flat out didn't care, I wouldn't ask.
Asking for clarification is not disbelief. It is not disrespect. It is not 'negative'. It's simply asking for further information , Period.
Pagans are the first to complain they aren't taken seriously: that there are wonders to behold but people are too 'close minded' to explore those ideas. Yet if someone tries to explore those ideas: Kaboom!
However, since you've now explained you were just exchanging fantasy beliefs, pray continue and I'll not interfere.
Marto