QUOTE(Yarrow @ Aug 20 2009, 08:23 PM)
This is not an attack on you woozle but I have to say that I can’t stand the whole “listen to yourself and do what feels right for you” replies
Not taken as an attack at all.
I absolutely don't mean 'do what feels right'. You don't DO anything. Doing comes from books. You don't need to
do anything. If you want belief you have to find it in yourself, you have to know what you believe and that comes from understanding what is around you, your place in things, how you fit and how everything else fits. You can't get that from doing anything, certainly not by waving the arms. The only thing to do maybe is perhaps as others have said read up on anything and everything, but that just falls down to education.
Look around you, everything you see forms part of whole. THAT is what you have to find where you are in that whole, how it works, IMO and no book can tel you that. That comes from thinking, feeling, experiencing.
Unless of course you just
want a god of some sort, and a 'religion' to feel part of and some arm waving practices just to feel good about yourself and have something to believe in. Then by all means read rae beth or marion green. IMO
QUOTE(Yarrow @ Aug 20 2009, 08:23 PM)
but it helps to have an idea of what is out there.
This is a big problem imo, the 'what's out there' idea. What is out there is mostly without foundation, mostly fantasy. Out there is about
practices not about belief. If you want to learn about witchcraft great, read all the books available go to the witchy supermarket and get some trinkets, but you don't get
belief from a supermarket in the same way as you don't get it from a book. If you read a book and then decide that, say, Thor is the god for you, then that's just fantasy.
If you read up on Him because you like the idea/figure/personality as described in a book or books, you're interested in archeology and runes, like the whole norse idea, boats, sword and the like, look good in a thorshammer and so then ask said deity to pop in for tea, that, no offence to anyone intended, is pure bolix. That's inventing god and belief based on what others tell you and what you like. IF however, you 'get a god'

who perhaps acts a bit odd, tells you he is Thor and then you go and find out about him (though I still don't agree with doing that), at least the basic contact is possibly real.
The way I have been seeing this is that, if you you have an interest in egypt and egyptology you are more likely to start to believe in egyptian gods simpy because that's what you like. IMO you have to stay away from that sort of approach. That's just me though of course.
The hard part, or maybe the easy part if you're lucky, is finding the god, finding the belief. The easiest part is finding out about all the trappings.
I've lived for 30 years with a nameless goddess (am I alone in this? woozle wonders). What would change if I put a name to her? Nothing real. I'd just have other people's ideas on how she should appear, how she should behave and maybe, worst of all, how I should behave.
I'd find that everyone is an authority on my goddess and instead of experiencing her as she
is, I'd start to endow her with characteristics gleaned from the mental wankings of other people.
A question to provoke thought (not ire) , how come Thor or Ra, for example, if they exist as named gods, don't exist in Thailand too or Borneo or Kent? Could it not just be that these are invented names and consequently invented characteristics suited to the historical period and not relevant to the actual god at all but perpetuated in books?