What caught my attention was something the rabbi said - that paths are meant to come as a whole, and that there are often parts people will skip over because they aren't "fun" if they're assembling a path from bits of various religions. He felt that the non-fun bits were important, as they helped to do things such as teaching humility, and through enduring mild discomfort, helped to strengthen people against the things life throws at them.
If nothing else, things like this seem to give a feeling of give and take for a religion, which probably makes the overall feeling of a path being part of your life stronger.
So what do you think? I personally thought this made a lot of sense, though I'm not sure if my path involves much sacrifice - I do as much environmentally friendly stuff as I can, through recycling, taking public transport, trying not to buy overpackaged goods, and so on, but these don't really feel like major sacrifices. (A bit tedious when you're dragging the glass to the recycling bin and a bag splits, but never mind...)
So three questions -
Does your path have parts that you sometimes wish you could skip over, but you do them anyway because it feels like the right thing to do?
More interestingly, if you're an eclectic, have you selected part of paths that you find difficult or a bit tedious?
And finally - does a path need some hardship in it to toughen people up and make the religion more of a give and take relationship?
